Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 8081 - 8100
of 51,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
The gravamen of Plaintiff’s claim is that the officers used excessive force, i.e., failed to use reasonable force, given the circumstances. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 5:03 am
From Sitelock LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 2:52 am
Texas Mutual Insurance Company, et al., US, Docket No. 20-748. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 1:53 am
For the purposes of providing a useful answer to Questions 2 and 3, it should be noted that the expression «as such», as used in Article 1(c) of Regulation No 469/2009, must be given an autonomous interpretation in the light of the objectives pursued by that regulation and the overall scheme of which that expression forms part. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 1:22 am
The question before the Judge was whether this prior use constituted public disclosure of the invention, given the potential for a skilled person to have observed the prototype seed drill. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:33 pm
Q: I am a plaintiff in Milligan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 12:52 pm
Under Franks v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 12:39 pm
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Beckley Oncology Assocs. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 11:23 am
However, as we saw in the Lenz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 10:39 am
Ekins Terezakis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:04 am
The note lays out the reasons given by the court. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm
”[9] This definition is in line with the unique or limited edition treatment often given to NFTs, but the question still exists as to whether the digital nature of a work of art minted in an NFT is covered by VARA. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 8:45 pm
§ 253 to mandate access, at cost, to public property for private commercial use. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am
The case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
In Marquette Nat’l Bank of Minneapolis v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 3:41 pm
In 2018, in Carpenter v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 8:08 am
Howell shared an episode of Rational Security, the “Collusion Was Not an Illusion” edition: Lester Munson shared an episode of Fault Lines, featuring conversation about withdrawal from Afghanistan and the new U.S. sanctions on Russia: Bryce Klehm examined testimony given during a House Armed Services Committee hearing about possible problems that may arise from the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 7:25 am
Case citation: Gardiner v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:01 pm
Firstly, s.160 EPA was permissive, not mandatory In Knight v Goulandris itself, it was accepted by counsel for the appellant that the use of the word “may” in section 15(1) is some indication that the provisions which follow were intended to be permissive only. [read post]
