Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 8081 - 8100
of 8,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2009, 4:07 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:57 am
Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc., 155 F.3d 331 (4th Cir. 1998); see Cummings v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:14 am
" (8) United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
Opinion below (8th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Brief amicus curiae of AT&T Inc. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Osram Sylvania, Inc.2nd Cir.Comparators In Employment Discrimination Case Must Be SimilarBillue v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 9:33 am
Other Court Cases: United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
They don’t know very much about irradiation, or how it would benefit them. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Pfizer Inc., 867 N.Y.S.2d 425 (N.Y.A.D. 2008) (state appellate holding that plaintiff's home state controls on choice of law; similar to, but much better than, Desiano); (15) Vanderwerf v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:30 am
For instance, in Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Engle v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Class 46) Trading Standards officers uses new inspection powers granted under Copyright, Designs and Patent Act (Out-Law) United States US General IP legislation to watch in 2009 (Law360) IP cases to follow in 2009 (Law360) US Trade Representative issues statement on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ContentAgenda) Does the Federal Circuit need a fresh viewpoint? [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:43 pm
Roosevelt UFSD; grants Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 9 01/28/2008 01/28/2008 Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.9 10 S6773 ROBACH -- Relates to compensation benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of certain state officers state officers and employees; repealer;appropriation BLURB : Civ Serv. comp benefits Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 10 01/28/2008 provided that the applicable effective date for Parts A through B shall be as specifically set forth… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Play to win, don't just play not to loseLandavazo v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 216 F.R.D. 478, 480 (D. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:59 am
Ideation Unlimited, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 3:49 pm
But that's not necessarily true of soccer games, probably because soccer doesn't have the long and established history in the United States that baseball does. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:25 pm
In Conradt v. [read post]
