Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 8081 - 8100 of 9,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am by INFORRM
’ (Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127, 205) The burden of proving the existence of Reynolds privilege is on the defendant (Ibid, 203) who must show that there was a real public interest in publishing the matter complained, that the inclusion of the words complained of was justifiable, and that in the circumstances publication was made responsibly (See, for example, Lord Neuberger in Flood v Times Newspapers [2010] EWCA Civ 804, at [31]). [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:33 pm by Madelaine Lane
The POUM Clause provides that the legislature may not mandate a new activity or increased level of activity of any unit of local government (such as a school district) unless the State pays the unit of local government for any associated increased costs. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:47 am by Wendy Seltzer
Since 1982, patent cases, unlike most other cases in our federal system, have all been appealed to one court, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
The district court declined the government's invitation to apply a five-level enhancement under the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines"), finding the government had not met its burden of showing that Phillips had distributed child pornography to others. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:00 am by Rosalind English
(N v Secretary of State for the Home Department).Even if extreme destitution can be proved, there must be a close and direct link between the destitution and the actions of the state. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:31 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Title: United Rentals v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia explains, under the laws of evidence in effect in the United States, a presumption of a particular fact can be made without the aid of proof in some situations. . . . [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 pm by INFORRM
    After considering the approach in the United States and Canada and the domestic case law on justification of interferences with constitutional rights she concluded that a rule which placed the burden of proving falsity on the plaintiff would put his constitutional rights to dignity at risk [52]. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:59 pm by James R. Marsh
The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]