Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 33,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
I'm a little surprised that this opinion is unanimous.There are three different possible interpretations of the part of the federal supplemental jurisdiction statute, 28 USC 1367(d), that says that state limitations periods are "tolled" during the pendency of a federal action (and for thirty days thereafter) if the federal court ultimately exercises its discretion to dismiss supplemental state law claims. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:56 am
The ABA literally forced an unwilling law school to engage in preferential admissions, in violation of Grutter v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:45 pm
ACLU v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:52 pm
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 5:34 pm
Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v City of Upland, 2016 WL 1169302 (CA App. 3/25/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Medical Marijuana [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:57 am
Adams and has argued six arbitration cases at the California Supreme Court, including Armendariz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am
” At the Conflict of Laws blog, Trey Childress examines what human rights litigation will look like after Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:31 pm
But here’s a little career-offender discussion. . . .United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 8:20 am
Circuit decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 6:13 pm
California. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
Tri-Star Electronics Int'l. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
The court distinguished the Doe 1 v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In a part of Bush v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:25 am
The University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law has posted video coverage of its OT10 Supreme Court Preview. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:19 am
Regulation of medical marijuana is also discussed in various CEB books, including The California Municipal Law Handbook §§9.47-9.52 and California Land Use Practice §12.62. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:00 am
Digital Sin, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:36 pm
Second, on a choice of law issue I won’t get into (even though it is interesting), the Court held that certain state’s laws should be applied for certain plaintiffs instead of California. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:33 am
Gore but teamed up in 2009 to challenge California's ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:55 am
The plaintiff’s count under the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. [read post]
