Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 33,836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2019, 4:44 am
Senate Bill with bipartisan support would reverse that ruling, Gross v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:44 am
Lawyered podcast, Imani Gandi and Jessica Mason Pieklo argue that “the fallout from the Court’s decision to overturn decades of precedent” in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm
Wade, according to Leah Litman of the University of California, Irvine School of Law in a column for The New York Times. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:49 am
The court reasoned that California law has a strong presumption for the ABC test to apply retroactively. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
Last up is Shabo v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:29 am
The Reporters express agreement with another controversial California opinion, Perdue v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am
” At his eponymous blog, William Goren looks at Monday’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:06 pm
State officials argue that Colorado’s law legalizing industrial hemp cultivation supports this policy. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
I am delighted to announce the publication of "Next Generation Law: Data-Driven Governance and Accountability Based Regulatory Systems in the West, and Social Credit Regimes in China," Law &: Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 28(1): 123-172 (2018).In the contemporary world, compliance systems and policing are quickly replacing law and the traditional methods of enforcement (either organic or positive law) as… [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:04 am
City of Los Angeles, California 18-1257 Issues: (1) What test – in a case under Shaw v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:41 am
On May 3, 2019, in Anthony Ayala v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:25 am
Supreme Court’s 2019 ruling in Epic Systems v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:30 am
Franchisors Now Need to Prove the Negative in California appeared first on Franchise Law Update. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am
Richard Re analyzes Monday’s opinion in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
On Monday, in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 1:34 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:25 pm
Jan-Pro Franchising Int’l, Inc. held that the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:15 am
Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:56 am
In Nevada v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
In Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
