Search for: "Claimant(s)" Results 8101 - 8120 of 26,248
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2018, 9:01 am by Randolph Rice
Big insurance companies like GEICO make massive profits on the backs of claimants who settle their cases too quickly for less than they are worth. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:58 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, the court granted the employer’s motion to dismiss eight of the class claimants because the EEOC failed to allege an impairment that affects a major life activity or failed to identify essential job functions. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:40 am by Gregory Dell
Hartford accepted the peer review opinion without explaining why it discounted the completely opposite and well-documented opinion of the claimants treating physician. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:53 am by Steve Lubet
A few other courts have ruled for ME/CFS claimants, but none with the definitive clarity of Hayden’s opinion. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 12:52 pm by Peña & Bromberg, PLC
If there’s no finding or affirmative proof that the claimant is malingering, the administrative law judge is supposed to give clear and convincing reasons for rejecting a claimants testimony. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:03 pm by Daniel Sullivan
However, it becomes less clear what the employer’s obligations to a claimant are with other types of medical providers, such as pharmacies. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:03 pm by Daniel Sullivan
However, it becomes less clear what the employer’s obligations to a claimant are with other types of medical providers, such as pharmacies. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:57 am by CMS
The High Court decided in favour of the claimant and rejected the defendant’s application. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 6:30 am by ohioemployersinjurylawblog
However, CMS has made it very clear that “(a)ny claimant who receives a WC settlement, judgment, or award that includes an amount for future medical expenses must take Medicare’s interest with respect to future medicals into account. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 6:16 am by Paul Clouser
  The Court found no error in the Judge’s acceptance of the employer’s evidence because Claimant failed to meet her burden of proof by presenting unequivocal medical testimony establishing a causal connection between her injury and the alleged work-related cause. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 4:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Since that time claimants have been filing the merger objection suits in courts outside Delaware. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  The claimants application for an order for the trial of a preliminary issue was dismissed. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm by Giles Peaker
The claimants are of Irish Traveller descent, living in temporary accommodation in Hillingdon. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 5:36 am
On top of all of that, today's featured arbitration involves two interesting quirks: the Claimant is a FINRA funding portal member and the arbitration forum waived the firm's member surcharge and fees. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:05 am
It also ordered that the proceedings continue in order to determine the actual amount of the damage to be awarded to the claimants, also taking into account Spanish law with regard to ZARA ESPANA's activities.CommentThe decision of the Milan court represents one the first national applications of the CJEU ruling in Nintendo v Big Ben. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:21 am by Bonny Rafel
Nichols’ claim turning to the policy’s definition of  “regular occupation”—which defines a claimants occupational duties as they are “normally performed in the national economy,” rather than “the unique duties performed for a specific employer or specific locale. [read post]