Search for: "DOES, 1-20"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 27,665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2020, 9:04 pm
Illnesses started on dates ranging from Sept. 20 to Dec. 21, 2019. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:04 pm
Illnesses started on dates ranging from Sept. 20 to Dec. 21, 2019. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:47 pm
" On November 19, 2019, Conduct Officer Kytan detailed her findings to Mucaj, and on November 20, 2019, she detailed her findings to Karal. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 3:43 pm
Illnesses started on dates ranging from September 20, 2019, to December 21, 2019. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:31 am
The prosecutor found that the court does have jurisdiction over events in Palestine and that the other necessary preconditions for investigation have been met. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
(c) 4.50% 36 1.90% 6.40% 32 4.50% Tenn. 7.00% 2 2.53% 9.53% 1 2.75% Tex. 6.25% 13 1.94% 8.19% 13 2.00% Utah (b) 6.10% 16 1.08% 7.18% 20 2.95% Va. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm
Despite the glee with which admin law academics and practitioners anticipated and met Vavilov, where does this actually leave us? [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:15 pm
FTC, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-00014-DMF, Dkt. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:15 pm
But since I'm an academic, I'll focus on those briefs:1. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:26 am
Davis, 353 N.C. 1 (2000) (explaining that even when the rules of evidence don’t apply, “they may be used as a guideline to reliability and relevance,” and holding that “hearsay statements introduced therein must be relevant and bear indicia of reliability” and the “judge still must determine the admissibility of evidence subject to general rules excluding evidence that is repetitive or unreliable”); State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:36 am
Mayea-Pulido, No. 18-50223 (1-3-20)(Friedland w/M. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:58 am
Here are my three current favorites: 1. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
The position is available from 1 June 2020 or as soon as possible thereafter. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
See§ 9003(e)(1)(A); Abbott, 560 U.S. at 5. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Accordingly, because the Final Order does not actually mandate that television service providers distribute a channel that broadcasts the Super Bowl, but instead simply imposes a condition on those that already do, its issuance was not authorized by s. 9(1) (h) of the Broadcasting Act. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:14 pm
The court ruled that such action does not suggest by the legislature the intent to pardon conduct under the repealed statute. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
” This statute, like Domestic Relations Law § 70, does not define the term “parent. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s an overview: 1. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, December 20, 2019, Sean Wilson, v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:06 am
This amounts to about $20 per month for the average disabled person. [read post]
