Search for: "David C "
Results 8101 - 8120
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2009, 11:03 pm
Tolland State's Attorney Matthew C. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 11:00 pm
David B. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm
(via WSJ) Post-Grant Review System The Innovation Alliance recently sent a letter to USPTO Director David Kappos outlining requirements for a post-grant review system that is designed for prevent delay and abusive challenges. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:24 am
. --- Lolita C. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:50 am
BROWN AND LOLITA C. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 10:06 am
This case was originally summarized by Kim Yee and edited by David W. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:48 pm
His chief claim to fame in California, however, probably lies in the fact that he once publicly slapped United States Senator David C. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:35 pm
Governor David A. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:52 pm
MacDonald and originally edited by David W. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:47 am
Administrations past and present have reserved the right to employ rendition, see David Johnston, U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:12 am
"
SPECIAL REPORTS:
Health Care LawMonday, November 2, 2009" In this Special Section from the New York Law Journal: 'Medicaid Provider Compliance Programs Now Mandatory,' 'The New Security Breach Notification Requirements' and 'Protecting Whistleblowers.' "
Also, in the highlighted article from this section,
Free With Registration: The Rise of Patient Safety Organizations"David S. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 12:25 pm
I. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 9:47 pm
Hall & Dietmar Harhoff & David C. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 9:26 pm
Even better, I've just come across a copy of the Pre-Hearing Response filed on behalf of three of the Connecticut respondents by David Atkins and Marcy Tench Stovall of Pullman & Comley, that knocks the Disciplinary Counsel's case right out of the park. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 12:09 am
David Lat, the blog's managing editor, declined comment Thursday, but on Wednesday he wrote that there had been no settlement and that the posts Donald Marvin Jones complained about will remain on the site. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:49 pm
" By David C. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:21 am
Both sides emerged as both winners and losers (see PatLit here for a brief explanation and some idle speculation as to what the costs order might look like), and Class 99 waxed lyrical on the analogy between the design issues in this action and those in the 'pig fenders' case ( C & H Engineering v Klucznik [1992] FSR 421: as David Musker notes, "for pig read potato").So is there anything left for the IPKat? [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:26 am
Firm attorneys David C. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
Some color additives listed under regulations in 21 CFR Parts 74 and 82, such as D&C Red No. 6 and D&C Red No. 7, are required to be batch-certified by FDA before they may be used in cosmetics. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:50 pm
The new Agency would impose significant costs on lenders who would be required to: (a) offer to consumers on a preferred basis plain-vanilla products designed by the Agency either before offering their own products or at the same time; (b) seek prior regulatory approval for new lending products which could be defined as minor variations on existing products; (c) face the risk of having lending products banned altogether; and (d) have to comply with various other rules and regulations. [read post]
