Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 8101 - 8120 of 108,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2017, 4:30 am by Robert Schaffer
Lack of anticipation based on a single reference does not preclude a finding of obviousness based on the same reference. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:38 am by Taylor Gillan
[opinion, PDF] that Alabama should be able to justify its decision to assess on railroads a fuel tax that it does not assess on motor carriers. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 11:11 am
The question is one that ONLY the Pennsylvania Supreme court can answer, and as of this moment it has not answered it.In another news report, they got it right, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme court to render a decision on the OPEN State question: Does state law pre-empt local ordinances under the state [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The court held that the ordinance is a neutral and narrowly-tailored time, place and manner regulation that does not violate the 1st Amendment. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:20 am by Marie Louise
: Apimed Medical Honey v Brightwake (PatLit) (IPKat) (EPLAW) Gemcitabine – France: Court of appeal upholds [...] [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:01 pm by Jaclyn Belczyk
The US Courts of Appeal for the Fifth and Ninth Circuits have held that the act does... [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:07 pm
In an appeal on his blog to the patient advocate community, he warns that [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:00 am by Todd Presnell
But does the privilege survive a corporation’s death by dissolution? [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 7:54 am by Steve Lash
In its 5-2 decision, the Court of Appeals rejected Martaz Johnson’s ... [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:14 am
The Court of Appeal for Ontario [official website] in October ruled [JURIST report] that a witness does not have to remove her veil unless the failure to do so will prevent the accused from receiving a fair trial, and should be determined on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 8:40 am
A three-judge panel for the Ninth Circuit previously ruled [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] that the state secrets privilege does not bar a lawsuit against a [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:48 am by Simon Gibbs
And if it is, does service of a claim form where […] The post Unlawful service by unregulated person appeared first on GWS Law. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Software developers should take note of a recent English Court of Appeal decision. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 5:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit today issued a decision applying the federal CAN-SPAM Act. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by Jaclyn Belczyk
The Court of Appeals of California concluded [opinion] that Supreme Court precedent established in 2006 in Georgia v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 1:15 am
Unsecured creditors may claim post-petition attorneys’ fees Mayer Brown LLP "In a decision that will be of great interest to the creditor community, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held, on November 5, 2009, that the Bankruptcy Code does not bar an unsecured claim for post-petition attorneys’ fees that was authorized under a valid prepetition contract. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In the case, the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals held  that the National Labor Relations Act does not apply to a Catholic parochial school teacher's duty-of-fair-representation claim against his union. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm by Podhurst Orseck
The Eleventh Circuit ruled Wednesday that because it has held sovereign immunity does not protect Florida municipalities and state agencies from being sued, they cannot immediately appeal rulings that reject sovereign immunity as a defense, paving the way for more municipalities to have to face court in federal cases. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:32 pm by Jaclyn Belczyk
[transcript, PDF; JURIST report] the court heard arguments on (1) whether the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's (TTAB) [official website] finding of a likelihood of confusion precludes Hargis from relitigating that issue in infringement litigation, in which likelihood of confusion is an element; and (2) whether, if issue preclusion does not apply, the district court was obliged to defer... [read post]