Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2009, 5:52 am
Co., 21 Misc 3d 1 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]). [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 8:27 pm
Application of examination for discovery rules (8) Rule 27 (15), (20) and (22) to (26) apply to an examination under this rule. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 12:00 pm
" Your reply attempted to defend DOE from our findings that 20 percent of DOE's contracts that ended in Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 exceeded their contract amounts by 25 percent, or more," Thompson wrote. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:04 am
(See Doug Christensen’s analysis of this decision, posted Monday, April 20, 2009.) [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Petitioner stated that CCP 382 does not set forth all the requirements of class certification. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:45 am
§ 1681c(g)(1)). [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 11:40 pm
Clearly, the 4 to 1 funding disparity signals a major problem, though it still needs to take into account the fact that some juvenile defendants are privately defended, and the prosecution handles cases and investigations that might never make it into the system, thus not requiring an equivalent response from an indigent defender. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 10:16 am
In Vaughn, we stated thatdistrict courts may find facts relevant to sentencing by a preponderance of the evidence, even where the jury acquitted the defendant of that conduct, as long as the judge does not impose (1) a sentence in the belief that the Guidelines are mandatory, (2) a sentence that exceeds the statutory mandatory maximum authorized by the jury verdict, or (3) a mandatory minimum sentence under [21 U.S.C.] [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:33 am
Does our salvation lie in monetary policy? [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
" Martin and Brenda Patton owned land in upstate New York about 20 miles from the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
The FBI estimated that approximately $1 billion in losses were inflicted by the mortgage fraud schemes targeted by Operation “Malicious Mortgage. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 7:47 pm
Due to severe losses, [the dad] closed the 20-year-old family business. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 1:46 am
Napp said that the defendants' Cimex tablets infringed these claims. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:36 am
Aug. 20, 2002):[Third-party defendant] argues that the customer list is critical to the question of whether [third-party plaintiff] is the real party in interest in this case. . . . [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 11:57 am
Commissioner Kovacic does not address the intersection in his article. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:26 am
That defendant had the keys to the car does not render the car any less "readily mobile" under the standard that guides this court's analysis. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
Roberts, NO. 08-13753, 2009 WL 714329 (11th Cir., Mar. 19, 2009) it again affirmed that Booker does not apply to resentencings under § 3582(c)(2) pursuant to § 1B1.10(b)(1), id. at *1. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 6:08 am
March 20, 2009).* Defendant had to be present to object to invoke Randolph. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 3:52 am
The judge didn’t buy it, and neither does the 8th, especially since Penix had been less than diligent in discovery. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:26 am
Prodigy was served with a copy of the complaint on June 20, 2002. [read post]
