Search for: "Doe Officers" Results 8101 - 8120 of 137,053
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2017, 11:34 am by Kate McGovern Tornone
“It does send a message but I don’t know that it actually changes anything at this point in time,” she said. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Generally speaking, the court does not believe that the place of business exception in the statute should be extended to cover the situation here presented. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" the Appellate Division rejectected Petitioners argument that application of the cited regulation is arbitrary and capricious given that Officer actually worked in her light-duty assignment for less than one year and “did not work in any capacity after September 21, 2010,” the Comptroller has held that the phrase "continuously assigned" — as applied in the context of 2 NYCRR 364.3 (b) — "does not mean continuous performance and is not… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" the Appellate Division rejectected Petitioners argument that application of the cited regulation is arbitrary and capricious given that Officer actually worked in her light-duty assignment for less than one year and “did not work in any capacity after September 21, 2010,” the Comptroller has held that the phrase "continuously assigned" — as applied in the context of 2 NYCRR 364.3 (b) — "does not mean continuous performance and is not… [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" the Appellate Division rejectected Petitioners argument that application of the cited regulation is arbitrary and capricious given that Officer actually worked in her light-duty assignment for less than one year and “did not work in any capacity after September 21, 2010,” the Comptroller has held that the phrase "continuously assigned" — as applied in the context of 2 NYCRR 364.3 (b) — "does not mean continuous performance and is not… [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The catch is that to pursue the appeal, the officer has to concede for purposes of the appeal that the plaintiff's version of events is true and that, based on those stipulated facts, the officer gets the benefit of the doubt and therefore immunity.This excessive force claim does not lend itself to qualified immunity because the parties still disagree about basic facts, even on appeal, such as how far plaintiff was from the officers when they shot him,… [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" the Appellate Division rejectected Petitioners argument that application of the cited regulation is arbitrary and capricious given that Officer actually worked in her light-duty assignment for less than one year and “did not work in any capacity after September 21, 2010,” the Comptroller has held that the phrase "continuously assigned" — as applied in the context of 2 NYCRR 364.3 (b) — "does not mean continuous performance and is not… [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:02 pm
Of course, this does not mean the police officer can pull anyone over based on incriminating information about the owner from the computer system. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:53 pm by M. Ramana Rameswaran
The Dispense Fee is paid directly to the Dispensing System manufacturer, who does not generate Federal healthcare program business. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:24 am by David Adelstein
First, the independent tort doctrine does not apply when there is not a contract between the parties. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
A pending matter, my office is working on involves a boy who sustained a brain injury due to the doctors' delay in perfoming a c-section. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Here’s an excerpt from the story: “Just as a kind of a query, what legal authority does the sheriff or anybody have to walk in to someone’s home and take property? [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The officers concealed their faces with paper bags and did this at night. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:14 am by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
But there are substantial reasons to believe that the federal officer removal statute does not permit the former president to evade the people of New York. [read post]