Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 152,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 7:11 am
Rangel-Fuentes v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm
[iii] Springer v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:21 pm
Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:00 am
Conservation Law Found. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:52 am
Cunliffe (which it does cite, together with some other cases). [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 4:03 pm
Now over 25 years old, Brown v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am
Whren v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:47 am
Primary Investments Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Medtronic Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:10 pm
On November 1, 2011, in Weingarten Realty Investors v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:56 am
Accordingly, said the court, “Applying the proper standard, DOE's determination was not arbitrary and capricious, but was rationally based in the record, which included the investigator's report and the testimony of the investigator and principal at the administrative hearing,” citing Murane v Department of Education, 82 AD3d 576 [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:57 am
Termination following discipline hearing conducted in absentia upheldChawki v New York City Department of Education, Manhattan High Schools, District 71, 39 AD3d 321The New York City Department of Education (DOE) served disciplinary charges and specifications on Houda Chawki, a tenured high school teacher. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:57 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 5:30 am
The patentee does not exhaust its... [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:46 pm
Section 47 does not restrict the court’s jurisdiction and/or discretion as does Rule 20; the section allows an order to be made [...] [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:15 pm
It has become difficult to understand why the Federal Circuit does what it does in any number of rulings, but its decisions relating to patent eligibility have set patent law back several generations, turned precedent on its head, ignored the Patent Act passed by Congress, and unnecessarily and inexplicably expanded upon bad Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 2:15 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:22 pm
Adler v. [read post]
