Search for: "High v State"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 35,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
[WSJ] * In an absolute shocker, Texas is illegally keeping high schoolers off the voter rolls. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 7:24 pm
Click below to read the post on LinkedIn: New Process for Primary Payers Resolving Medicare Conditional Payments Begins TodayRelated articlesSingle Payer: State v Federal (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)A California Lesson: How to Kill Workers' Compensation Pill By Pill (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)High Compensation Medical Costs Raises Concern in New Hampshire (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)CMS Posts Sample Notice To Beneficiaries Regarding Appeal Rights… [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:07 pm
In an infamous case, People -v- Brandon, Judge Somers ruled that, "the MMA is rendered unconstitutional in its entirety by operation of the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution." [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:00 am
The case is Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, et al., v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:41 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 4:48 am
Wright v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Rev. 131, 134 [2010] [collecting empirical data from numerous studies and concluding that “approximately 4500 people are wrongfully convicted every year in the United States due to eyewitness identification”].) [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Rev. 131, 134 [2010] [collecting empirical data from numerous studies and concluding that “approximately 4500 people are wrongfully convicted every year in the United States due to eyewitness identification”].) [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
As Noonan J in the High Court succinctly summarized Collins in Duggan v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána [2017] IEHC 565 (06 October 2017) [8], a breach of section 7 DPA88 “is not actionable per se but only on proof of actual damage”. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:37 am
It came after the United States Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:33 am
Unites States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:26 am
The Sixth Circuit recently ruled inPhelps v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
The High Court in Northern Ireland dismissed the appeal. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” Debate on last week’s oral arguments in McCutcheon v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
HMRC appealed both of these decisions, known respectively as the “Bingo appeal” and “Slots appeal”, both of which were subsequently dismissed by Norris J in the High Court. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:07 am
The Appellant’s employer believed that the continued employment of experts involved in the high-profile McKie case would be damaging to the new body’s reputation. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 3:34 pm
First out of the argument box will be Riegel v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:04 am
As reported in most of the main news outlets this morning, the Administrative Court, wearing the face of Mr Justice Kenneth Parker, handed down its judgment yesterday in R (on the Application of British Telecommunications Plc & TalkTalk Telecom Group Plc) v The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2011] EWHC 1021 (Admin), concerning BT and TalkTalk's application for judicial review of the Digital Economy Act 2010. [read post]
