Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 19,805
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2013, 11:56 pm
” Whilst the relevant clauses of the Bill may stay with the same numbering for sections of the Act, that isn’t guaranteed". [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:11 am
Discrimination You guys don’t have to let employees pray to a Flying Spaghetti Monster. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
They didn’t just take the two partners responsible for the clients,” says Murphy. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
Author Michael B. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:38 am
” Id. at *9.Both prescribers testified that they didn’t care about the indications in the FDA-approved label. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Author Michael B. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 7:07 am
Copyright in software interfaces, according to Red Hat, equals to granting the statutory monopoly of copyright to ‘building blocks’ of a creative activity, which is specifically precluded by Section 102(b) of the Copyright Act, noting that—“[t]he use of computer program interfaces for compatibility and interoperability purposes is both ubiquitous and essential to the operation of information and communication technologies and infrastructures. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:40 am
§ 507(b), as a defense in their motion to dismiss. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
” (And perhaps they will not even write formalized reports, because they don’t need them.) [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:39 am
My favourite reads: Double Aspect, Administrative Law Matters, Slaw. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 11:30 am
District Court Northern District of Texas.H/T Gary NurkinText and original photos copyrighted 2010-2018 by Cultural Heritage Lawyer, a blog commenting on matters of cultural property law, art law, cultural heritage policy, antiquities trafficking, museum risk management, and archaeology. [read post]
24 May 2015, 6:54 pm
§ 751(b). [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Lee that “[w]hen followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity,” at least where "[g]ranting an exemption . . . to an employer operates to impose the employer's religious faith on the employees." [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 10:56 am
(As largely faith-based groups, the volags are also subject to a higher authority, but I won’t dwell on that here.) [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:17 am
It will be interesting to see what Judge Jones has in store next. _____________________________________________________________________________ Eliana T. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:05 pm
It wouldn’t be New Year’s Eve without predictions, would it? [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:37 am
Now, I've been wrong before, but the simple fact is that if you make a Chapter 13 budget too restrictive, it won't work; ordinary people, and for that matter extraordinary people, have expenses and needs, and they sometimes show up unexpectedly. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:30 pm
B. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
The State also argues that at least the judge should have held an evidentiary hearing on the matter, but this goes nowhere, too, the court noting a hearing isn’t necessary when the documentary materials are sufficient to decide the matter, as they were here. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
Intoxication manslaughter is a serious charge, and something that district attorneys can choose to prosecute in DWI matters. [read post]
