Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 8101 - 8120 of 36,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2019, 10:01 am by Kent Scheidegger
(the Act) conflict with article II, section 5, subdivision (c) of the California Constitution (article II, section 5(c)) and are therefore invalid. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
“Although the Court is sympathetic to Plaintiffs’ complaint, the sweep of Sec. 230(c)(1) as a matter of text and legislative purpose is broad,” the court noted. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 8:55 am
If you have info you can share about this matter, please contact us. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:22 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
General remands give a dist ct the authority to address all matters as long as there is consistency with the remand. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 9:26 am
In a BCL §1118 valuation case involving a real estate holding C corporation called Matter of La Sala, a New York trial court refused to apply a discount for BIG tax liability on the ground that it was required to value the corporation as a going concern and, therefore, it would not consider capital gains taxes triggered upon liquidation. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 11:29 am by Christopher G. Hill
  In M&C Hauling, M&C provided hauling services to the defendant through a subcontract with Hauling Unlimited in 2014, the last of which was in July. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:58 am
The chances of c) are 1 in 2.1 billion, by my calculation, but no matterâ€â [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:08 am by Simon Fodden
” In Canada, the government introduced two bills in 2009 that pertained to cellphone tracking, among other matters: Bill C-46, the Investigative Powers for the 21st Century Act; and Bill C-47, Technical Assistance for Law Enforcement in the 21st Century Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Sec. 1447(c) authorizes a federal trial court to remand a case to state court for either (1) lack of subject matter jurisdiction or (2) defects "other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:25 am by Matt Osenga
Section 102(c) defines common ownership under a joint research agreement. [read post]
As protests erupted over decades of racial injustice sparked by George Floyd’s death at the hands of Minneapolis police, companies rushed to publish statements in support of Black Lives Matter. [read post]
   This means, as of today, there is no requirement that VA medical centers maintain medical staff for health matters unique to women Veterans. [read post]
In decades past, it didn’t really matter whether business executives nurtured their relationships with employees. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm by Shea Denning
John Rubin wrote here about litigation on that issue, noting that one prominent feature of the statutory scheme was that determining matters of disclosure and release “takes time. [read post]