Search for: "Mark"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 151,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2017, 3:38 am
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark CERTIFIED CHIANINA BEEF [with CHIANINA BEEF disclaimed], finding Applicant Klickitat's evidence of acquired distinctiveness to be inadequate in light of the highly descriptive nature of the mark. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:44 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark THE LAFAYETTE for sandwiches, finding it likely to cause confusion with the mark LAFAYETTE, registered for vegetable salads. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
Ultimately, in 2016, the Opposition Division of the EUIPO ruled that the SUPERMAC’S mark must be rejected for all goods and services that were identical or similar to those offered by the various McDonald’s marks. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:05 am
Bergsman).Flair contended that his mark referred solely to himself, while registrant uses the mark NATURE BOYS to refer to its customers, who enjoy fishing and seek gear to wear while fishing. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 3:27 am
" BIG BARK is an imaginary thing, and thus the mark is incongruous. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:00 pm
"Based on non-use of the mark in connection with the services described in the registration, the TTAB cancelled the marks. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:20 am
Nonetheless, "confusion in not likely because of the crucial difference in the marks. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 5:43 am
Fleurop argued trade mark infringement. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 3:23 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark URBAN PIE PIZZA CO. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:52 am
A mark may be deemed deceptive even if the descriptive term is embedded in a larger mark. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 4:04 am
The thorny issue of the registration of a 3D trade mark never ceases to challenge the trade mark system. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:12 am
" Applicant's "mark" failed that test. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:15 am
The Board reversed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark ZOMBIE CINDERELLA for dolls, finding the mark not likely to cause confusion with the registered mark WALT DISNEY’S CINDERELLA & Design, shown below, also for dolls. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 3:54 am
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark LA BOMBA, finding it likely to cause confusion with the registered mark LA BAMBA (Stylized), both for cigars. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:01 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark CAOS for tequila, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered marks CHAOS COCKTAILS and CHAOS ON THE ROCKS for "alcoholic mixed beverages except beer" [COCKTAILS disclaimed]. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 6:42 am
It is not the trade mark. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm
By way of an analogy with Medion, a “rule” had developed in which Medion is applied to the use of an earlier mark as part of a composite later mark even where reproduction is not identical. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 2:19 am
"The modified mark must contain what is the essence of the original mark, and the new form must create the impression of being essentially the same mark. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:30 am
To put it simply, the more descriptive the mark, the more Section 2(f) evidence required.The Board noted that Rodale's mark is comprised of two "common and readily recognizable words that, combined, will be easily understood by consumers in the context of applicant's services. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:53 am
Pioneer Embroideries Limited, Opposition No. 91171969 [Opposition to registration of the mark HAKOBA, in the stylized from shown below, for textile fabrics and cloths, on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the previously-used mark HAKOBA for the same goods]. [read post]
