Search for: "Mark Case" Results 8101 - 8120 of 70,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2023, 7:48 am by Geoff Schweller
LLC More CFTC Whistleblower News on WNN The post CFTC Accepting Whistleblower Award Claims for Goldman Sachs Swaps Case appeared first on Whistleblower Network News. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
/Nov. 2022 (Aug. 28, 2023) CASE NO. 22-MJ-8489-BER (orig. filed Oct. 27, 2022) CASE NO. 22-MJ-8533-BER (orig. filed Nov. 21, 2022) CASE NO. 22-MJ-8534-BER (orig. filed Nov. 21, 2022) CASE NO. 22-MJ-8547-BER (orig. filed Nov. 28, 2022) CASE NO. 22-MJ-8548-BER (orig. filed Nov. 28, 2022) CASE NO. 22-MJ-8549-BER (orig. filed Nov. 28, 2022) CASE NO. 22-MJ-8550-BER (orig. filed Nov. 28, 2022) Government notice of filing in which redacted… [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm by Thomas Surmanski
Suter: The Case of the Missing ThumbThe Facts and Following AttacksThe facts of R. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 3:32 am
While he knows the case was watched closely by other attorneys, he believes the court's decision in Santos v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:55 pm
European readers may remember TRAVATAN as the mark Alcon couldn't register as a Community trade mark for ophthalmic pharmaceutical preparations in the face of an opposition based on Biofarma's earlier Italian TRIVASTAN mark for a peripheral vasodilator (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 1:57 am by Jim Walker
  This led to a hung jury and a decision to re-try the case. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
The false marking amendments apply to all cases, without exception, that are pending on or commenced on or after September 16, 2011.The court granted Lubber’s request to add the patent marking claim to its complaint asserting trademark and unfair competition claims under the Lanham Act, Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, and common law.ConstitutionalityThe court rejected Optari’s argument that the false marking statute is unconstitutional.Some courts… [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 1:09 am by Neil Wilkof
Kat friends Karen Lai and Joshua Kwan discuss a fascinating recent case from Singapore that had the opportunity to address both. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 7:19 am
Independent of these third-party uses on other goods, there may still be confusion between Omaha Steaks’ marks and GOP’s new mark for consumers purchasing meat.Because the Board's analysis under the sixth du Pont factor was "fatally flawed," the court vacated its finding and remanded the case with instructions to the Board to "reweigh the limited, relevant evidence of third-party use. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:32 am by Amy Howe
  Howard Wasserman previewed the case for this blog, while Mark Denton and Jessica Kim do the same for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:08 am
The current (April 2010) issue of Sweet & Maxwell's European Trade Mark Reports (click here for details) carries reports on various important recent trade mark cases, the first of which is an English translation of the ruling of the Court of Appeal of 's Hertengebosch in Revillon Chocolatier v Trianon Chocolatiers BV. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 am by Jason Rantanen
Thus, the unfair competition cases primarily involved unregistrable marks. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:57 am by Michael Fox
Given the length of time the Board has been operating with only two members, and thus deciding only those cases where Democratic and Republican members could agree, there is a substantial backlog of cases to be decided. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 11:36 am by Nikki Siesel
Since The Board affirms approximately ninety percent of the cases appealed in likelihood of confusion refusals, the question to ask is what makes this case different. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 11:36 am by Nikki Siesel
Since The Board affirms approximately ninety percent of the cases appealed in likelihood of confusion refusals, the question to ask is what makes this case different. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 2:24 am
It's one of those 'continuity of function' cases that is really important for applicants and opponents in trade mark proceedings but deathly boring for students and laymen. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 7:44 pm by Nikki Siesel
In this case, the Opposer made the necessary demands for documents requesting proof of use of the mark in commerce prior to the trademark filing date. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
 The decision goes through a long analysis of the case law on the nature of trade mark rights. [read post]