Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 12,301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
Most people would note that copyrighted works show a remarkable consistency in pricing: iTunes, for example, has a very narrow range of prices for digital song downloads. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:51 am
Maryland v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
Annuities v. lump sums: younger people opted for the annuity versus the lump sum more than older people across all conditions. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am
Brown v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am
Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 3:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 4:03 am
Krakoff, University of Colorado School of Law Judith V. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 4:03 am
Krakoff, University of Colorado School of Law Judith V. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
This year, the Supreme Court of Canada will likely decide Canadian National Railway v McKercher LLP. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 7:20 am
In California Pines Property Owners Association v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 11:40 am
In recent cases like Allure Jewelers v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 9:51 am
A follow-up question would be whether Google gives people the ability to wipe their old data. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 11:27 pm
She is a professor in the Faculty of Law, Faculty of Medicine and the Joint Centre for Bioethics at the University of Toronto; and Co-Director, International Reproductive and Sexual Health Law Programme and University of Toronto.Fred V. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 7:50 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:24 pm
The Seventh Circuit decision was of potentially major significance, because it marked the first time that a federal court at that level had accepted — at least temporarily — the argument that a profit-making company owned and run by people of strong religious faith fully shares their right to protection of their religious principles. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
In the absence of proof that real people were exposed to products that were unsafe or ineffective (instead of just improperly promoted), there is simply no injury, and thus no standing, for any sort of claim by a TPP or other beneficiary for purely economic loss. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:30 am
” So we know on an intellectual level that “story model research” is correct when it instructs about the power of stories to persuade. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
Here are the facts of Tate v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit invalidated an Illinois law barring most people from publicly carrying loaded guns in Moore v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
