Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 178,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2009, 12:40 pm
There's a new weblog by James Publishing, which publishes (often plaintiff-oriented) law-related works like my own Deposition Checklists and Strategies. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
In denying a plaintiff’s motion to remand, a district court in Kansas held that the defendant proved by the preponderance of the evidence that jurisdiction was proper after the plaintiff failed to present any evidence rebutting the defendant’s supporting affidavit. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 11:13 am
Here are five California employment related statutes that can expose employers to a plaintiff’s attorney’s fees: 1. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 11:19 am
In honor of Women’s History Month, Courtroom View Network is excited to highlight 10 of the powerhouse women trial attorneys included in CVN’s video library, featuring both plaintiff and defense work. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
Allen Overton and Melissa Mays, co-plaintiffs in the lawsuit that led to the ongoing replacement of Flint’s lead pipes, describe lessons learned—and a community that’s determined to better its future. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 9:15 pm
Although the court unanimously agreed to reinstate the West Point High School teacher's lawsuit, justices disagreed as to how far plaintiff Peter Vlaming's free-exercise-of-religion argument could be taken. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:45 pm
The Fourth Circuit revived some of the plaintiff's claims. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 11:26 am
Next time, plaintiffs, be more careful what you ask for. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 6:38 am
[Plaintiff] then argued that under [defendant's] construction, the patented claims were not anticipated. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:21 am
In addition, [counsel's] conduct has not only wasted the Court’s, Plaintiff’s, and the Mediator’s time and resources, but has significantly harmed his client’s defense. . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 8:44 am
The court stated that “plaintiffs may not bootstrap their way into standing by ‘inflicting harm on themselves based on their fears of a hypothetical future harm.'” In sum, the circuit court unanimously dispensed of the plaintiffs’ complaint, affirming the district court’s decision, and stating that the case could not be decided on fear of future harm and that the plaintiffs lacked standing. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
NealonLackawanna CountyJudge Nealon rejected the Plaintiff’s contention and sustained the Defendant’s Preliminary Objections. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 10:57 am
The suit states that the plaintiff was picking up medication prescribed for her daughter’s seizures but she was given the wrong medication. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:12 am
Men’s Journal The Cookie Crumbles for Amazon Privacy Plaintiffs – Del Vecchio v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:15 am
Alternatively, courts might apply a more subjective balancing test at the conclusion of proceedings to determine whether the pseudonymous plaintiff's complaints would have been dealt with more productively via pseudonymous self-help. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:00 pm
The following are a few expenses that the plaintiff had to cover that will typically be factored into the compensation amount by the judge: Medical costs– While presenting the plaintiff’s case, the plaintiff’s lawyer will detail all the medical costs that were incurred as a result of the injury. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:45 am
Defendants, without TriPharma’s consent, marked and continue to mark, used and continue to use in advertising, offered and continue to offer for sale, and/or sold and continue to sell the Mandura Product in the United States and in this District with “US Patent #6,899,892,” the 892 Patent number, the word “patent, and/or the word “patented” with the intent of counterfeiting or imitating the Original Product and/or deceiving the public and inducing them to… [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:23 pm
Smith denied Plaintiff's motion to overturn the cap and reduced the Plaintiff's verdict to his medical expenses and $620,000.00 in non-economic damages (the malpractice must have occurred between October 2002 and September 2003). [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:23 pm
Smith denied Plaintiff's motion to overturn the cap and reduced the Plaintiff's verdict to his medical expenses and $620,000.00 in non-economic damages (the malpractice must have occurred between October 2002 and September 2003). [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
Our San Francisco, Oakland, and Santa Rosa plaintiffs’ law firm believes in keeping our clients informed and educated, whether it is a personal injury matter, a False Claims Act case, a small business dispute, or any other claim within our firm’s purview. [read post]
