Search for: "Read v. People" Results 8101 - 8120 of 21,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
Read the article explaining why you should sign the Petition here. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 10:55 am by Rebecca Jeschke
That’s continuing to raise important questions about who can read those announcements, and what happens when people are blocked from accessing and commenting on important social media feeds. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:17 am by Jon Hyman
And I got curious—just how do people feel about the l’il ol’ Oxford comma. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:58 am
" and a  "connection could be made between the signs LOVOL and VOLVO in the minds of consumers because there is a ‘visual dictionary’ in the human brain which people develop when learning to read". [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm by David M. McLain
  The only reasonable reading of the statute’s language, according to the Court of Appeals, is a reading of the plain meaning of the words used. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 4:44 pm
  Then people who want to know more about the questions can more swiftly and easily see the reasoning of the judge who's asking them. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:49 pm by Bill Marler
(Goulet V, King LA, Vaillant V, de Valk H. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 3:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Supreme Court first applied this theory of implicit divestiture on limitations of tribal civil regulatory authority in the landmark case Montana v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 2:30 am by Patrick Bracher
The case is National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 10:16 am by Patrick Bracher
The SABC tried the academic argument in SABC v Masstores to get R7.5 million penalties out of Masstores and rightly failed. [read post]