Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 33,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm
Eduardo M. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:25 pm
I'm holding out as long as I can [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
The fact of the matter is that copyright is interested in incentivizing creative expression, and whether that expression is about a living person without their permission is irrelevant to copyright’s purpose. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Defining Commonality of Interest The “commonality of interest” test in ERISA’s employer definition is designed to distinguish bona fide association plans from state-regulated commercial insurance offered to the public at large. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Defining Commonality of Interest The “commonality of interest” test in ERISA’s employer definition is designed to distinguish bona fide association plans from state-regulated commercial insurance offered to the public at large. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 4:52 am
I'm not even going to go there.My problem is this -- I'm not Hirshman's generation and I'm not part of Gen X. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:40 am
I would think so, and I’m glad the court read the statutes that way. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:17 pm
I’m no fan of the Bush era officials, but whatever the national interest means these days it probably includes fending off war crimes charges by foreign courts. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 12:35 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
International law recognizes that States have the inherent right20 to override legal obligations to defend ‘national security’ or ‘essential security interests’.21 However, States can creatively allege simulated, artificial, or, at best, doubtful national security directives. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 10:54 am
By Lisa M. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
Anti-SLAPP statutes are meant to protect speakers against meritless lawsuits based on their speech (though the exact kinds of speech protected by the statutes vary from state to state); the protection comes chiefly in the ability to get meritless cases dismissed early, and to have defendant’s attorney fees and court costs paid by the losing plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:55 pm
But that's going beyond the point I'm trying to make here.) [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 5:03 am
[An interesting federal government argument, in a case pending in D.C. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm
The answer, of course, is that there's not a one.It's about that simple.Doug Berman and Scott Greenfield and I'm sure others note the mix of today's opinions. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:59 pm
Indeed, in State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:08 am
A print publisher qualifies as a DJP if it: “provide[s] information to an audience in the state. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
”I’m not surprised that the result of the Court taking the case was a new articulation of the standard; it’s the kind of thing only the Supreme Court can do. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:26 am
Cooke, 10–333, CA9 (Reinhardt, Wardlaw, M. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:54 am
MASSACHUSETTS, 129 S. [read post]
