Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 13,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
By Glen Hansen In Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 7:55 am
Which means Held v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 11:25 am
Bay Area Citizens v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 12:41 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
” We are looking for balanced and critical views of major aspects of wine regulation, including oenological practices, legal regime of grape varieties, organic wines, land use, plant variety rights, and environmental issues. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
Save Our Access v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
Co v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:07 am
The Supreme Court of the United States made it clear today, and will do so in writing. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:20 pm
They challenged the grant of outline planning permission for a new business park on a huge area of brownfield land on the Isle of Grain. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:25 am
After Congress halted tribal treaty-making in 1871, the Court 's 1886 U.S. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:03 pm
Recently, however, in Lyle v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
[Justice Gorsuch v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 11:11 pm
See Lucas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 3:56 pm
Mecklenburg, a dispute over land ownership in Alaska that hinges on whether a state court has the power to correct a federal surveyor’s location of a water boundary. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court held 5-4 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 8:13 am
Metropolitan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am
It cannot be signed by someone under a power of attorney (St Ermins Property Company Ltd v Tingay [2002] EWHC 1673 (Ch); [2002] HLR 11) or any agency agreement (Cascades & Quayside Ltd v Cascades Freehold Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1555; [2008] L&TR 23). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (OCCA) ordered an evidentiary hearing and the trial court held that state jurisdiction was proper because it occurred on state land and rejected that the land was an allotment, but did not address the other claim that the land was a reservation. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
California State Lands Commission (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 549. [read post]