Search for: "Stevens v. Stevens" Results 8101 - 8120 of 10,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
Stevens, in which the Court “struck down a law making it a crime to sell depictions of cruelty to animals. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
  SCOTUSblog’s Tom Goldstein examines the Term’s pattern of opinion assignments and finds it “quite likely . . . that Justice Stevens was originally going to author the Court’s opinion in Bilski [v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
The other decision was State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In the 1992 case of New York v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 5:18 am
  My prior blog post https://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2023/10/upcoming-limits-on-fcc-statutory.html noted that an expansive reading of West Virginia. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:56 am by Stephen Griffin
  The implications of this move for the Reconstruction amendments is especially evident in the recent scholarship of Steven Calabresi. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  Sociologist Steven Brint distinguishes further between “expert knowledge professions” and “social trustee professions,” while emphasizing that many modern professions encompass elements of both roles. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Suppose a missile or meteor struck Congress while it was in session, killing all or nearly all of its members--so that it would lack a quorum to act; suppose further that chaos ensued more broadly throughout the country, so that to restore some semblance of law and order the president needed to take two actions that are pretty clearly unconstitutional: (1) suspend habeas on his own authority; and (2) give directives to state and local officials who do not wish to carry out those directives, which… [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Before the discussion, Clare Cushman will introduce viewers to the Society’s newest publication, An Illustrated Guide to the Supreme Court.The Organization of American Historians is circulating the amicus brief it joined in United States v. [read post]