Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 8101 - 8120 of 19,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by Eleonora Rosati
This is an evergreen – yet still vexed – question.Recently, it was tackled once more by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in a case – THJ v Sheridan [2023] EWCA Civ 1354 – concerning copyright protection of graphic user interfaces (GUIs).As readers with a penchant for the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on originality will promptly recall, the treatment of GUIs under the InfoSoc Directive was at… [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) In this recent SCOTUSblog post on the upcoming Supreme Court case of Fisher v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 2:58 pm by Kevin
        Related StoriesUnited States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am by Lisa McElroy
  Earlier this week, I discussed the Court’s opinion in McNeill v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Justice Alito wrote a dissent joined by two other judges, saying that the law was swell, and Justice Kagan voted with Alito but provided no explanation for her vote. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 2:38 pm
 The two words were brought together in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, in Population Diagnostics Inc v The Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2012] EWHC 3541 (Ch), a decision from last Thursday by Mr Justice Warren in an appeal against the refusal of Mrs Chalmers, on behalf of the UK's Intellectual Property Office, to grant two somewhat curious patent applications. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
 Notwithstanding the novelty, the Court was of the opinion that there was sufficient physical contact and enough non-hearsay allegations of intent and behavior to make out a prima facie case.As they prepare for trial, Dibrino's lawyer may want to consider going with paperless invoices.For a copy of the Justice Court's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm by AALRR
"  Over two years later, the case still has not been scheduled for oral argument, and it remains to be seen when the California Supreme Court will decide the case. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:08 am by Kevin LaCroix
For the first time in almost 30 years, the Supreme Court will begin its new term will only eight justices. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
On 15 July 2014, Mr Justice Nicol handed down judgment assessing libel damages in the case of Kadir v Channel S ([2014] EWHC 2305 (QB)). [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:14 am by Pam Brannon
Finally, if all you really want is to find some peace and seek out the inner stillness of the law, try some Supreme Court haiku. [read post]