Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 8101 - 8120 of 14,274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Geeyoung Min and Alexander M. Krischik
Second, since the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in California State Teachers’ Retirement System v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm by Eric Goldman
Panelists: • Deirdre Mulligan, Co-Director, UC Berkeley Center for Law & Technology • Eric Goldman, Director, Santa Clara High Tech Law Institute V. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by admin
In 1997, the Supreme Court voted to strike down a Georgia law requiring candidates for state offices to pass a drug test in Chandler v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:45 pm by Tyler S St Cyr
Congress had strong reasons to empower states to create administrative law systems, which most courts have internalized. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:59 am by Amy Howe
He contended that other state and federal courts have held that the test does apply to such fees; moreover, he added, there is “strong tension” between the California court’s decision in his case and the Supreme Court’s more recent decisions. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Literature claims: strong TM protection is likely to lead to investment into strengthening the mark, not to innovation in product; and TMs are more valuable for incremental innovation than basic, so that might induce overinvestment in existing tech rather than new and untried tech. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:39 am by John Coyle
Supreme Court handed down its decision in Great Lakes Insurance SE v. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
War is the means by which nation states have sometimes resolved their differences. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 2:27 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
  That is the issue that the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench recently dealt with in Manitoba Eastern Star Chalet Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The excellent questions raised show how fertile a field this is for scholars to till.A few years ago, David Congdon, now the Senior Editor at Kansas, told us it was a high priority of his to issue a book on United States v. [read post]