Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 11,375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2011, 2:27 pm
District Court Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California said a policy by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London might cover California Mortgage & Realty's alleged negligence in remitting funds or servicing investments. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 12:04 pm
” Here, the California Supreme Court expressly overruled that standard. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
That in itself is unusual, unless New York practice varies markedly from what we are familiar with in California. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
That in itself is unusual, unless New York practice varies markedly from what we are familiar with in California. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
That in itself is unusual, unless New York practice varies markedly from what we are familiar with in California. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:48 pm
The Supreme Court has ruled that “the dual sovereignty doctrine . . . compels the conclusion that successive prosecutions by two States for the same conduct are not barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause.” This is true, as far as it goes. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:38 am
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP is a State Bar of California approved MCLE provider. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:31 am
He is an active member of DRI and its Workers’ Compensation section, and also serves as the Vice Chair for the Workers’ Compensation Section of the Alabama State Bar. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:07 pm
Judge Hayes of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California today issued this ruling on the dispositive motions in Martin v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:58 pm
Alternatively, one could closely examine some of the state statutes governing land use: in California, that would be CEQA and, say, SB 375. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:40 pm
To meet this end, the Law Library is a resource library open to the Judiciary, members of the State Bar of California, and all residents of the County of San Mateo and the State of California for the purpose of legal research and the examination of law books and other legal materials. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:31 am
Plata - Court upholds Federal court order finding constitutional violations in California’s prison overcrowding, and requiring the state to reduce its prison population. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
A recent decision by a Colorado federal court, however, says that Concepcion bars a generalized adhesion contract defense to an arbitration provision. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
Although that large number of rules has been approved through the highest level of the State Bar (i.e., the Board of Governors), at this time only six rules have been submitted to the Supreme Court of California for immediate consideration. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:00 pm
I’m licensed in two states, and, because of the strict requirements of the state in which I practice now–South Carolina–I had to take the full bar exam (multistate, federal, and professional responsibility) and attend a three-day “Bridge the Gap” course prior to being admitted. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:59 pm
(It is noteworthy that a California court recently held that an individual’s zip code was ‘personally identifiable information’ and therefore protected under a California law meant to protect consumer privacy.) [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:55 am
And on his California State Bar Moral Character Determination Application Form, he truthfully disclosed his irregular immigration status to the California Bar Examiners in response to that specific application question. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm
If the judgment cannot be enforced, your client has no further options because the original cause of action is time barred. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:38 am
The August 2011 online edition of the California Bar Journal reports on proposed revisions of the ethics rules: The State Bar has submitted to the Supreme Court 67 proposed new Rules of Professional Conduct that offer a behavioral roadmap for... [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, agreed that the unconscionably finding under California law was preempted by the FAA. [read post]
