Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 8101 - 8120 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am by John Elwood
Village at Lakeridge, 15-1509, involves questions so important for the Republic, so pressing for our body politic, that the Supreme Court of the United States called for, and now has received, the views of the solicitor general. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:43 am by Leslie Griffin
One of the agencies, Catholic Social Services, sued, arguing that it has a free exercise right to do business with the city while continuing to discriminate against same-sex couples, whose marriage rights are protected by the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 10:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
In July, the Seventh Circuit issued a unanimous opinion in the case of Emmis Communications Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:27 am by Terry Hart
This past March, the Supreme Court considered in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:25 pm
The speech prohibited in the cake case, like the “White Applicants Only” sign, is thus quite similar to solicitation of illegal conduct, or offers of illegal conduct, which the Court has held are constitutionally unprotected (see United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 2:24 pm
The defendant bears the burden of demonstrating that counsel's representation was not meaningful. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:22 pm by Patent Litigation Group
[xxii]  As a result of the United States’ entry into World War II in December of 1941, the seller was unable to obtain an export permit for shipment into the United States and had been previously delayed due to repairs and war conditions. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 5:56 am by Jonathan Hafetz
In considering this trade-off, it is important to remember that the United States bears full responsibility for the unconscionable delay and continuing legal morass. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
United Kingdom (1980), 3 E.H.R.R. 408 (Comm.), at p. 415, applied in Re F (in utero), supra. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 11:02 pm
The consultation document notes that in Belgium those prisoners who receive a sentence of longer than 4 months are disqualified from voting; in Austria prisoners who are sentenced for a year or more are disqualified; in Italy prisoners serving 5 years or more are disqualified and in Greece all prisoners who are given a life sentence are permanently disenfranchised.33 The Government acknowledges that setting the threshold at which prisoners become disenfranchised may lead to inconsistencies and30 HL… [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:54 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Practitioners and corporate counsel should not be without it on their desk, since the Report is the sole compendium of its kind in the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Judge Barrett was a member of a panel affirming by unpublished opinion an appeal brought by a Native prisoner in Wisconsin state prison, Schlemm v Carr. [read post]