Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 24,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm
”) Background Facts Staub, a member of the United States Army Reserve, worked at Proctor Hospital as an angiography technician. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 1:58 pm
It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The Bladensburg Peace CrossThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a cross-shaped monument may be preserved on public land because it does not violate the Constitution's Establishment Clause.Cultural property watchers may not have noticed the case of American Legion et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:06 am
The recent case of Chevron Mining v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:22 pm
United States case challenging the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
5 May 2016, 9:18 am
On April 1, 2016, the United States Patent and Trademark Office published final rules in the Federal Register that relate to post grant proceedings. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
The Court remarked that after briefing on the issue was complete, the Ninth Circuit, in United Steel v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 5:07 pm
Lunkenheimer Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
In the Virginia case—titled Landini v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:44 pm
During the course of clinical trials conducted in the United States some years later, Cephalon noticed that the formulation used by them displayed increased side effects as compared with equivalent doses tested in European clinical trials. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:30 am
If it does not “ ‘give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice’ ” of its scope, United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:37 am
In Fait v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
In the United States, about 1.5 million preventable adverse drug events occur every year. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Further, the Act provides a severe penalty of $100 each day that a payor knowingly fails to pay ordered amounts to the State Disbursement Unit. 750 ILCS 28/35(a). [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:41 pm
Here is the abstract:In Panetti v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that the State of Washington filed its brief yesterday in Doe #1 v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:03 am
She was treated free of charge at United States Army hospitals by virtue of her husband's military status. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:52 am
The Facts The facts are simply stated. [read post]
