Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 8101 - 8120
of 19,106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 8:24 am
Background Our law firm represents a United States credentialed merchant mariner who was the nominal employee of a security services company named American Guard Services. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:01 pm
” This is the turn in religious liberty discourse and doctrine that the United States has needed since RFRA was first passed in 1993. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
In the next couple of weeks, the court will consider the Cubist petition as well as that of Dow v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:10 am
United States. [read post]
17 May 2016, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 1:00 pm
” Two recent United States Circuit Court decisions highlighted a split on this issue. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:56 am
United States, 31 Fed. [read post]
15 May 2016, 5:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
Last week in the Courts On 9 May 2016, Langstaff J handed down judgment in the case of Oyston v Reed ([2016] EWHC 1067 (QB)). [read post]
15 May 2016, 7:41 am
The past couple of weeks have brought some slightly brighter news for innovators in life sciences and software fields seeking patent protection in the United States. [read post]
15 May 2016, 3:00 am
Walther's Sacred Interests: The United States and the Islamic World, 1821-1921. [read post]
13 May 2016, 1:56 pm
In United States ex rel. [read post]
13 May 2016, 5:38 am
Many New York City Uber drivers use the Uber app more than 35 hours a week—pretty much full-time—in contrast to the rest of the United States, where the majority of drivers use the app less than 10 hours a week, according to Plouffe. [read post]
11 May 2016, 10:52 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:05 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:49 pm
Just weeks after a federal district judge for Northern California denied preliminary approval to a $12M class action settlement to resolve Lyft drivers’ misclassification claims—because the settlement was based on an “artificially low estimate” of damages (Cotter v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:17 am
In April 2015, the United States Supreme Court in Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:17 am
In April 2015, the United States Supreme Court in Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 8:11 am
If the United States desires a new protected class under Title VII, it must seek such action by the United States Congress.... [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:42 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 21 NY3d at 154, quoting Consolidated Edison, 98 NY2d 208, 222 [2002]; see United States Fid. [read post]
