Search for: "Centers v. State"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 22,005
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 4:12 pm
Our friend Professor Adam Levitin at Georgetown Law Center sent one of us the following message on Twitter a few days ago, questioning whether such an override would have any impact at all: @AlanKaplinsky Trying to puzzle through this. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
For unlicensed centers, the act requires a notice on site and in any print or digital advertising stating that the CPC is not licensed as a medical facility by the state and that it “has no licensed medical provider who provides or directly supervises the provision of services. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 11:04 am
Additional Resources: Edwards v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
Wolff; Donald V. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:21 am
He filed an amicus brief supporting the cert petition in NIFLA v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
In State of Missouri v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
Munchee was seeking $15 million in capital to improve an existing iPhone app centered on restaurant meal reviews and create an “ecosystem” in which Munchee and others would buy and sell goods and services using the tokens. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:10 pm
United States Government (E.D. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:08 pm
Federal agencies were at the heart of segregating the suburbs before and even after Brown v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
The ACLU’s Voting Rights Project today amended our complaint in ACLU v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:35 am
This also explains why NIFLA is distinguishable from Burwell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:00 am
Knauff v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
He submitted an amicus brief in support of the crisis pregnancy centers’ cert petition in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:06 am
“The fact that speech is in aid of a commercial purpose does not deprive responded of all First Amendment Protection,” explained the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
On Nov. 17, 2017, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri reconvened for the purpose of receiving testimony from Professor Ellen Yaroshefsky, an ethics advisor to defendant’s learned counsel Richard Kammen, who had previously resigned over undisclosed ethics concerns. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
The immediate cause of the confusion is Justice Frankfurter's cryptic opinion in Guaranty Trust Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:26 pm
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:41 pm
See, e.g., Gunder’s Auto Center v. [read post]
