Search for: "Childs v. State" Results 8121 - 8140 of 21,044
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
Can there be a more psychologically charged moment than that in which a child gives his vote of approval or disapproval for the holiday gift that his parents have carefully chosen for him. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 9:57 am by Orin Kerr
The law also supersedes any countervailing state law under an express preemption section, § 108(k). [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 12:54 pm by John Floyd
  This was illustrated in the December 17, 2015 decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:04 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
On December 15, 2015, the Supreme Court of New Jersey issued an opinion modifying and affirming the Appellate Division’s decision denying the appeal by the New Jersey Division of Child Protection & Permanency in the case of New Jersey Division of Child Protection & Permanency v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
  According to the court, the next development was that Laughland became aware of the Facebook page, Laughland suspected Jean Placke, the mother of his child, had created the page out of spite because the two were embroiled in a custody battle. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:35 am by Timothy P. Flynn
To date, the chief case to address the workplace marijuana issue is Coats v Dish Network from Colorado. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am by INFORRM
More recently, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Zakharov v Russia stated that “the interception authorisation, … must clearly identify a specific person …or single set of premises”. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:39 am by Jon Gelman
State of Florida (or as the Third District referred to it "Padgett v. [?] [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The California judge who ruled on Findley v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am by Steven Blumenthal
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]