Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 16,617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2014, 6:06 am
Rule 8.4(d) says that it is “professional misconduct” for a lawyer to “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice”.The panel also dismissed the allegation that Harvey violated Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h), which says it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to “engage in any other conduct that adversely reflects on the lawyer’s fitness to practice law. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
Does that clarify things for you? [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:08 am
A story on NBCNews.com quoted an attorney with Florida Legal Services as saying the industry is in compliance with the law even though it does not pay its workers overtime. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
We will answer those questions and provide the Q&A on our H-1B Visa Lawyer Blog. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:56 am
” However, he contends, although “[h]ow Justice Kennedy would rule is indeed an open and highly interesting question, . . . [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
[21] This also implies that both the parody ‘on’ and the parody ‘with’ are covered by the EU parody exception: a parody does not need to criticize or be directly in contrast or in a dialogue with the original work, as it does not need “to relate to the original work itself”. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 5:25 pm
But it does not seem to be the case that The Economist advocated letting the Irish starve to death. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 8:51 am
Nor does the evidence raise a genuine question of material fact on this point. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
Clark, Jeff R. and Lawson, Robert A. and Nowrasteh, Alex and Powell, Benjamin W. and Murphy, Ryan H, Does Immigration Impact Economic Freedom? [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Still others might be reluctant to kill a particular potential attacker, for instance when a woman does not want to kill an abusive ex-husband because she does not want to have to explain to her children that she killed their father, even in self-defense. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
Opinions respecting a grant of rehearing are even more so, even if for no other reason than if a judge does not think a case should be reheard en banc, he or she would have an opportunity to make that clear as part of the en banc opinions on the merits. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:58 pm
H/T Janet Levaux (Think_JanetL) my source for this post. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
The Gambia Trial The event began with a fascinating discussion at the Robert H. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:12 am
Does anyone think for one second that Chancellor Wise or anyone else at the University of Illinois would have a problem with demeaning, abusing, or disrespecting such viewpoints? [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:04 pm
Because the m-index does not stabilize until well into a scholar's career, Burk only calculated the m-index for those teaching ≥10 years, so junior IP scholars are not included in this ranking, even if they have a high h-index. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am
The work includes the overall form as well as the arrangement and composition of spaces and elements in the design, but does not include individual standard features. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 6:43 pm
To continue reading the article go here. h/tip Scott Malouf [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Does equity serve the role of bringing the formal structures of law closer to notions of justice? [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 4:58 am
H/T Dan Hull, What about Clients? [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
