Search for: "Google, Inc" Results 8121 - 8140 of 11,023
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2015, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Since then, the picture has changed somewhat in relation to both Article 8 and the Data Protection Act: news organisations have raised concerns about the treatment of online search results, following the ECJ’s decision in Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González; the relationship between data protection and journalism was addressed in Steinmetz and others v Global Witness Limited;… [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:58 pm by Marie Louise
  Global Global – General Google chair says he will fight website blocking legislation (1709 Blog) Digital Economy Act: Google points finger to China, but patent application points to Google (IP Dragon) Copyfight: EFF co-founder enters e-G8 ‘lion’s den,’ rips into lions (ArsTechnica) e-G8 France attempts to “civilize” the Internet; Internet fights back (ArsTechnica)   Global – Copyright Online copyright: Norms or the law,… [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:06 pm
If you haven't heard of teleneurophysiology, know that the word tele is going to become as ubiquitous in health care over the next few years as the e- in e-prescribing.Telemedicine news: Feedback from service users will provide insight into opportunities for improvement so that performance can be optimised. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:16 am by Matthew David Brozik
Indeed, the defendants Blagman has sued are Apple Inc.; Amazon.com, Inc.; Google Inc.; Microsoft Corporation; EMusic.com Inc. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:06 am
In 1998, they started Google, Inc. in a friend’s garage, and the rest is history. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:36 am by Scott L. Vernick
Some of the major tech companies – Facebook, Google and Apple – could actually benefit from increased data privacy and security regulation if they take the initiative. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 3:08 pm
Google, Inc., the California Supreme Court recognized that "determining the weight of discriminatory or ambiguous remarks is a role reserved for the jury," and rejected the use of the Stray Remarks Doctrine in California. [read post]