Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 36,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
As protests erupted over decades of racial injustice sparked by George Floyd’s death at the hands of Minneapolis police, companies rushed to publish statements in support of Black Lives Matter. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 9:24 am
So clearly A +/- B should equal C. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm
Albert Florence was arrested in 2005 on a warrant for a matter that had already been resolved. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:49 am
And it’s also just an idea, no matter what profession it’s applied to. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Interpreting ARCAP Rule 9(c) to follow Rule 4(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appellate court concluded that, because the March 12 order did not resolve all pending matters before the trial court, Rule 9(c) did not apply. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
What was more controversial, and led to potentially relevant observations by the Court was the applicability of section 7(4)(c) to the matter at hand. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:26 am
Prob C §140. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:38 pm
Following dismissal of C&S’s complaint, Hess sued C&S in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York on the ground that C&S violated the venue provisions of the FDCPA by suing him in Syracuse City Court. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:22 pm
In the recent matter of State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Interpreting ARCAP Rule 9(c) to follow Rule 4(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appellate court concluded that, because the March 12 order did not resolve all pending matters before the trial court, Rule 9(c) did not apply. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:30 pm
Section 3730(c)(2)(B) contains no opt-out clause for rare cases or unusual circumstances. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Interpreting ARCAP Rule 9(c) to follow Rule 4(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appellate court concluded that, because the March 12 order did not resolve all pending matters before the trial court, Rule 9(c) did not apply. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 7:19 am
Nor for that matter has systematic contract management, but that’s a story for another day. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 5:48 am
G.S. 108A-48(c). [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 7:57 pm
The district court though favored the defendant and awarded Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL) for lack of enablement. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:40 pm
As the Court in Otto concluded, "[p]eople have intense moral, religious, and spiritual views about these matters—on all sides. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:52 am
The proposed legislation takes aim at clarifying Section 101 by enumerating a specific list of excluded subject matter and providing guidance for practitioners and judges on its applicability. [read post]
15 Oct 2006, 3:04 pm
This legislation provides for the removal, without open hearing, of any non-citizen who is found to pose a security threat to Canada:DIVISION 9 - PROTECTION OF INFORMATIONExamination on Request by the Minister and the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessReferral of certificate77. (1) The Minister and the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness shall sign a certificate stating that a permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of security,… [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
In the case of the FBAR matter, it was the blow up of UBS and other offshore banking institutions. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
As mentioned above, the Board also made an interesting statement on claim interpretation when discussing the objection of lack of inventive step against the main request:Ground for opposition under A 100(a) EPC 1973 in connection with A 56 EPC 1973 …[5.1] As a step preliminary to the assessment of whether the subject-matter of claim 1 of the granted patent is inventive, the question of how said claimed subject-matter should be understood was considered. [read post]
