Search for: "MATTER OF P S"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 18,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
Judge John P. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
The parties have been back in court to fight over other patents, resulting in the decision Synthon B.V. v Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd [2015] EWHC 1395 (Pat), which came out last week and which Darren reports in timely fashion.* When functionality cuts deep, it can be hard to handle: Yoshida appeal dismissedValentina's back again to pen on General Court's decision in Joined Cases C‑337/12 P to… [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
In deciding what course to chart, all circumstances are different and they matter - but is it not fair to ask you if your mind's stories of them are true, and what truly serves your child's interests? [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm
On the same day Munby P handed down judgment in the case of In the matter of M (Children) ([2015] EWHC 1433 (Fam)) an important decision about the wardship jurisdiction and the ambit of “super-injunctions”. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:07 pm
GUY P. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:07 pm
GUY P. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
GUY P. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:19 pm
(See Seigel, New York Practice §437, p. 708, 3d Ed. 1999). [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:55 pm
Complaint, p. 10-11. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:51 pm
Police ordinarily check the driver’s license, registration, proof of insurance and whether there are outstanding warrants. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am
Complaint, p. 10-11. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am
Complaint, p. 10-11. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:55 am
P. 26(b)(3)) is always related to policy positions being developed by the agency and is thus always exempt from disclosure under the public records law. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:33 am
P. 41(b).Have a nice weekend everyone.H/T SFLawyers. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:06 am
But there’s a condition. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:32 am
Probably all of them — and the data is in the report, redacated (p. 29) — but there’s nothing public. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:38 pm
Firemark.Entertainment Law Offices of Gordon P. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:21 pm
Since the Family Court's determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record, it will not be disturbed (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d at 173; Matter of Oates v Wilson, 46 AD3d at 905; Matter of Brian S. v Stephanie P., 34 AD3d at 686; Miller v Pipia, 297 AD2d at 365; Young v Young, 212 AD2d at 117). [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
I can say at once that, in relation to those matters, the decision appears to me to have been correct and to remain good law”. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:17 am
Writt, May 15, 2015, Johnson, P.). [read post]
