Search for: "Michaels v State"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 13,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2009, 6:56 pm
State v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Frye that offers new insight on U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
See Shirsat v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:49 am
Louis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
At Reuters, James Vicini has this article on the decision, "a defeat for California officials"; David Stout reports here in the New York Times; McClatchy's Michael Doyle has this story discussing the ruling, which affirms passengers' constitutional rights to search-and-seizure protections; at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in here on the Brendlin decision, stating "Justice Souter's opinion gets it right". [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Poppe, and Michael J. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:55 pm
Thomson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:03 pm
Last month, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) heard oral arguments in the important case of Prosecutor v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am
See FTC v. 1-800 Contacts. * Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
No matter what the number of the Trust, it makes no difference in litigation, except that the pleadings are different between the three law firms that have been prosecuting these cases in Texas: Regent and Associates (older cases), Michael J. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:45 am
The Convention states that it shall be permissible to make quotations from a work. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
In the most comprehensive iteration of the theory (which I dub version 3.0), Michael Newton argues that the ICC’s prescriptive and adjudicative jurisdiction is limited to whatever the State can transfer to it, meaning that a Status of Forces Agreement (“SOFA”) granting the United States jurisdiction over crimes committed by its troops in Afghanistan means that Afghanistan cannot “delegate” jurisdiction over U.S. nationals to the Court. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:41 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Timothy J. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:41 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Timothy J. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
While Congress exercises considerable control over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, since the landmark decision in Marbury v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm
United States The Socially Aware Blog has a post which considers a recent decision made by the Sixth Circuit in Signature Management Team, LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
