Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 8121 - 8140 of 12,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2010, 1:34 pm by Steve Hall
New Jersey claiming a jury, not a judge should have decided if she should be sentenced to death, and the other a Strickland v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
Both history and common sense make amply clear that people can identify with a certain religion, notwithstanding their lack of detailed knowledge about that religion’s doctrinal tenets, and that those same people can be persecuted for their religious affiliation. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Moving to the 1980s: it took empowering the courts with the Charter before bar entrance requirements banning non-citizens and bans on inter-provincial law firms were removed (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 and Black v Law Society of Alberta [1989] 1 SCR 591, respectively). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm by Steve Hall
The California Supreme Court opinion in People v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 4:04 am by SHG
Putting aside the fact that it took the Supremes two cases to make one ruling, since there could be no doubt whatsoever that the question of retroactivity loomed huge when they decided Miller v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 3:35 am by SHG
That's the backdrop to the Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 1:41 pm by Rick
Purnell, 652 F.3d 524, 532 (2011), quoting Tennessee v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Lofgren took issue especially with Pallante’s remark during the interview that “Copyright is for the author first and the nation second. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Lofgren took issue especially with Pallante’s remark during the interview that “Copyright is for the author first and the nation second.” At one point during the hearing, Lofgren asked Pallante about the remark: Now, this comment attracted quite a bit of attention among some people, especially my constituents in Silicon Valley, and it seems to me when you look at the Constitution, which empowers congress to grant exclusive rights in creative works in… [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 2:50 am by INFORRM
On 8 October, 14 US Attorney Generals filed separate lawsuits against TikTok for harming the mental health of young people. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Schwarzenegger took the position that the legislature lacked the power to legislate on this subject because of Proposition 22, which enacted one of the statutory provisions under challenge. [read post]