Search for: "Robert Rule" Results 8121 - 8140 of 29,649
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Yes, said an Ohio Court of Appeals majority opinion, reasoning that the speaker's past speech "was not engaged in for a legitimate reason, but instead for an illegitimate reason born out of a vendetta seeking to cause mental distress to his mother and sister and to exact personal revenge. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that “[t]he Madison ruling is just the kind of decision Roberts can embrace, because of his apparent displeasure that lower courts are too often circumventing or ignoring the high court’s decisions and doctrine. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by CAFE
Board of Education The Scottsboro Boys case and the ultimate pardon of the wrongfully accused Congress An article from the Asia Society on the history of Asian exclusion acts History of The Klu Klux Klan Act Constitutional Amendments Eighth Amendment Thirteenth Amendment Alabama An article in the New Yorker about Alabama judges’ power to “override” jury rulings and impose the death penalty Articles in Slate about Alabama’s Confederate Memorial Day and… [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Chief Justice Roberts asked a question that was skeptical of Lemon. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 5:52 pm by Howard Bashman
” Zoe Tillman of BuzzFeed News reports that “The DC Circuit Ruled That Robert Mueller Was “’roperly Appointed’; The court upheld a civil contempt order against former Roger Stone associate Andrew Miller, who refused to comply with a grand jury subpoena and challenged Mueller’s appointment. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 5:42 pm by Amy Howe
” In this case, the court observed, the IOIA refers to the immunity “enjoyed by foreign governments,” which “is an instruction to look up the applicable rules of foreign sovereign immunity, wherever those rules may be found. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
A federal district court ruled for the state and the American Legion. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 11:15 am by Lev Sugarman
Quinta Jurecic analyzed the order’s implications for the constitutionality of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s appointment. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 10:17 am by Amy Howe
The vote was 5-3, with Chief Justice John Roberts joining the court’s four more liberal justices in a ruling in favor of the inmate. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:55 am by Lindsay Offutt
The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled Tuesday that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s appointment was lawful and constitutional, rejecting a challenge by Andrew Miller who was held in contempt for failing to comply with subpoenas Mueller served on him during the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 4:30 am by Bob Bauer
Can Robert Mueller find a way to put his findings in all their factual detail before the public and intimate whether the president, if not indictable while in office, committed crimes? [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:30 am by Molly E. Reynolds
” Other reporting suggests that includes both Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Besides Chief Judge Beryl Howell, whose ruling in the Miller case the D.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:54 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Circuit ruled in In re: Grand Jury Investigation that DAG Rosenstein's appointment of Robert Mueller as Special Counsel did not violate the Appointments Clause. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:19 am by Lev Sugarman
Lawfare shared the opinion, which upheld a district court ruling declaring Miller in contempt for refusing to comply with the subpoena. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:41 am by Lev Sugarman
Miller had argued that the subpoena was invalid because Robert Mueller’s appointment as special counsel was unlawful. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Rizo, the justices “ruled that the decisive vote in a California pay dispute case before a lower court doesn’t count — because the vote came from a judge who died before the ruling was issued. [read post]