Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 9,600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
"No Cost" License Plate Readers Are Turning Texas Police into Mobile Debt Collectors and Data Miners
26 Jan 2016, 9:35 am
" Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
The case is Hill v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In October of this past year, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:11 am
But a new Connecticut Appellate Court case released today, Grasso v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court in the matter of Christopher v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Zbigniew Adwent v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:27 pm
“When state medical regulators sent [Denis’ doctor Steven Kaplan] letters suggesting the dosages were worrisome, he ignored them. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:35 am
The X-Ray being evaluated is compared to the X-Rays with the varying profusions and the doctor determines which profusion that X-Ray most closely resembles. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Clanton v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
In 2009, the court held in Teal v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Gillam v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
This much was made clear by the case of Byrne v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
The form included his doctor’s conclusion that he was “unable to perform management or line staff duties” due to major depression. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
The case is Papadopoulos v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
Stéphane Perron is a doctor and researcher who has looked at the psychological ramifications residential bed bug infestations. [read post]
12 May 2009, 1:15 am
The judges, in NJ CURE v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:21 pm
The Department of Corrections’ own doctors diagnosed her with Gender Identity Disorder and the Seventh Circuit recently stated in Fields v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 6:24 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 3:23 pm
The court rejected, as contrary to the statutory language and logic, the interpretation of CPL 20.10 (4) advanced in the landmark case of People v Puig that the term "community welfare" applied only to CPL 20.40, the county venue statute, and not to CPL 20.20, the State jurisdiction statute. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:16 pm
Comm. of the Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
