Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 9,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
” At first blush, section 3 (particularly the first part) is one of the most uncomplicated guarantees in the Charter. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
District Court Judge Gilham sought protection under the Act after suffering retribution for submitting a formal grievance documenting negative impacts of severe budget cuts on the functioning of the court system. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
This case presents issues concerning the standard and scope of judicial review under the California Environmental Quality Act. [read post]
11 May 2010, 6:08 am
In one case, the Court of Criminal Appeals in 2005 ruled for the first time that mental impairments can be introduced into evidence. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Davis v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:30 pm
The Court of Appeals overturned the District Court’s decision, holding that as the ordinances were content-based restrictions of speech they had to pass strict scrutiny and that they did not meet this standard. [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 10:45 am
Rather, it agreed with the Fifth District in Lentini v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm
Schwarzenegger, no federal court had invalidated a state law barring same-sex marriage, ever. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:23 am
This opinion is considerably narrower than Judge Walker’s opinion in the district court, and it relies very heavily on Romer v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 12:45 pm
From yesterday's decision by a Pennsylvania appellate court in Porter v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:49 am
Krishna Schaumburg Tan, Inc., 2018 IL App (1st 180175), the Illinois Appellate Court for the First Judicial District noted, in a pre-Rosenbach BIPA case, that the GIPA “provide[s] for a substantially identical, ‘any person aggrieved’ right of recovery” as the BIPA. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 8:55 am
District Court in Alabama denied a motion by the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Gravel v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
First of all, it is important to understand what a judgment is. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:02 pm
East Joliet Fire Protection District. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Strip-Searches: SUPREME COURT OKS STRIP-SEARCHING MINOR-OFFENSE ARRESTEES, Florence v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
The Court construes their silence as an indication that they did not intend to do so, and declines to legislate judicially. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:36 am
" People v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 7:10 am
One is by the attorneys general from sixteen blue states filed in the Eastern District of New York; the other is by the Regents of the University of California filed in the Northern District of California. [read post]
