Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 8121 - 8140 of 156,926
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 6:47 am by INFORRM
  The Court’s own “comparative-law survey” of the operation of parliamentary immunity showed that, despite some interesting variations, it is protected in all the surveyed member states. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
Perhaps the state (wisely) wants to avoid making bad law. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:25 pm
State Ethics Commission is not required to show an individual knowing and intentional engaged in prohibited post-public employment conductMatter of Gormley v New York State Ethics Commn., 2008 NY Slip Op 09245, decided on November 24, 2008, Court of AppealsThe issue before the Court of Appeals: Does Public Officers Law §73(18) required the New York State Ethics Commission to prove that an individual knew the alleged offending conduct was… [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:46 pm
Crocker (University of South Carolina School of Law) has posted From Privacy to Liberty: The Fourth Amendment After Lawrence (UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2009) on SSRN. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:22 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 1:42 am
Lyons, Reason's Freedom and the Dialectic of Ordered Liberty, 55 Clevland State Law Review 157-233 (2007).Frederick V. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:01 am by Lawrence Solum
The Supreme Court has placed limits on statutory subject-matter jurisdiction over declaratory judgment actions in which a state seeks a declaration that a state statute is not preempted by federal law—precisely the relief sought in Virginia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm by National Indian Law Library
* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2014state.htmlCases featured: Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm by INFORRM
alp judgment continues a strong tradition in European Court jurisprudence where freedom of expression prevails in cases of insult or defamation of heads of state, presidents or high ranking politicians (for example, Lingens v. [read post]