Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 8121 - 8140
of 29,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2011, 2:26 pm
The precedent here is confusing and partially contradictory, even at the Supreme Court level. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:10 am
Greenwood v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
The suit also states that the doctor should have told him not to drive a car. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Both state and federal courts in New York favor deciding cases on the merits. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:24 pm
State Supreme Court found that an extensive review of environmental issues was sufficient to meet the requirements of SEQRA without preparation of an environmental impact statement. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:38 am
” State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:28 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:51 am
The Ninth finds a little light, amongst the gray.United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 8:38 am
We get answers to only some of these questions in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:13 pm
The tireless, tiresome tire maker is still in a state of denial and filed a motion yesterday with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for a 30-day extension of time to file its second petition for rehearing en banc (full-court review) of the dismissal of Continental v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
This came squarely into play last week in Dougherty v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 11:24 am
The cases are entitled State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:01 am
Operton v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:56 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm
Waiver for Pre-Admission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASRR) Level I, Level II Assessments for 30 Days: For Medicaid-certified nursing facilities, Level 1 and Level 2 assessments have been waived for 30 days. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:32 am
Version 1.0 of the panel opinion contained an unfortunate, oblique reference to Microsoft v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
On March 5, 2012, Burgos filed a motion asking the judge to reconsider the ruling in “light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in” U.S. v. [read post]
