Search for: "State v. Money"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 20,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2015, 1:18 am
At the hearing, Ticketogo's solicitor stated that the true number of licensees was actually over 60 companies. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:04 pm
., in Melbourne, Florida, was on the winning side of Belanger v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:38 pm
Albunio v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
See Montgomery v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:12 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:48 am
We don’t agree with Wyeth v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 7:16 am
(Bryk v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
USPS v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm
Key Findings The fiscal responses to the COVID-19 pandemic will require policymakers to consider what revenue resources should be used to fill budget gaps. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 8:08 am
And although the department awarded 14 grants, it denied Trinity Lutheran’s application, citing a provision of the state constitution that prohibits money from the state treasury from going “directly or indirectly, in aid of any church, sect, or denomination of religion. [read post]
3 May 2009, 6:00 am
In Nijhawan v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:48 am
Thompson v Hurst [2012] EWCA Civ 1752This is a rather fact specific case which shows application of the principles of Stack v Dowden and Kernott v Jones. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 2:00 am
: Holley v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
FTC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:10 am
Fourth Estate v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
On January 17, a Florida appellate court issued its opinion (which is not yet finalized, as of this writing) in Gawker Media, LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 6:40 pm
Defendant Davist appeals from his sentence for false claims against the United States, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and false statements. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:00 am
City State Bank v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:59 am
By refusing to hear arguments over whether a state can limit campaign spending by corporations, the Supreme Court refused to reconsider its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
