Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 8121 - 8140
of 21,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2010, 8:53 am
Doing so would let the state close, conservatively, 12 to 20 of its 112 prison units over the same period, saving hundreds of millions of dollars per year. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 6:55 am
While Kresler’s “absence from the country did not relieve the government of its obligations to make good-faith efforts to have him returned,” United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
Nevertheless, it was persuaded by a recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Quality King Distributors, v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:16 am
United States Olympic Comm., 483 U. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am
Earlier this week the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am
Earlier this week the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 am
There is a good case to be made that it does. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:18 am
There is perhaps no region of the world more important than the Northern Triangle and Mexico in terms of the impact of corruption on the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:34 am
That's no excuse at all; when the United States Attorney endows lawyers with the powers of federal prosecutors, he has a responsibility to properly train and supervise them so as to avoid trampling defendants' rights. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm
And the rationale for selecting these countries was based on objective criteria regarding how each nation shares information with the United States—precisely the grounds stated in the March executive order. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
That’s good news. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
Another good read is the Trade Secrets & Noncompete Blog. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 2:41 am
In the United States, police cannot enter your home whenever they choose to do so (unlike some other countries). [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm
At the time he allegedly committed these offenses, appellant was the Republican Majority Whip of the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:45 am
" In State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:27 pm
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV: State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:43 am
Fontenot v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 10:12 am
United States purposes), but I think that Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion is consistent with Justice Alito’s concurrence on this point, and the concurrence certainly should be seen as important to understanding that majority opinion.) [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:02 am
This process is not bound by the strictures of the United States Code. [read post]
