Search for: "v. " Results 8121 - 8140 of 493,693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am by Bret Cahn
Kohler lacked capacity when she executed her advanced directives (Matter of Goldfein v Kohler, 221 AD3d 500 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York State Court of Appeals has held that the City Human Rights Law, one of the most expansive in the nation, does not allow plaintiffs to sue co-workers for discrimination, including the creation of a hostile work environment.The case is Russell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:52 am by Unknown
In the plaintiffs’ view, the new rule “represents simply the latest example of the Commission’s attempts to thoughtlessly apply rules geared toward traditional financial markets to the digital assets industry” (Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am by Chris Castle
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:05 am by Laura
For example, thedecision of the House of Lords in White v White [2001] 1 AC 596was adopted by the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong in LKW v DD [2010] HKFLR 016, enshrining the principle of ‘equal sharing’ of matrimonial assets in a shift from previous needs-based approach per C v C which had historically simply provided wives on divorce with enough to meet their reasonable requirements. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:05 am
Etihad StadiumAuthor Cléria De Souza Licence CC BY  2.0  Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Males,, Phillips and Birss) Supponor Ltd and another v AIM Sport Development AG [2024] EWCA Civ 396 (23 April 2024)This was an appeal against Mr Justice Meade's judgment in AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Ltd and another [2023] EWHC [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:45 am by Brian Leiter
Apt commentary from Cornell law professor Michael Dorf; from the opening paragraph: The positions staked out by the Court's most conservative Justices were themselves Trumpian, not so much in their audacity or mendacity but in their prolixity. [read post]