Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 12,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 3:24 am
While the definition of ESI is broad, it remains that what material falls within the definition and should be produced is a separate question addressed under Rules 26(b), 26(c) and 34(b). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
By Samuel C Berger, PC. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:50 am
The products in question were stored in an Italian warehouse and potential German customers were asked to collect them or to commission a freight forwarder that was instructed by an Italian company. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:53 pm
Argument focussed around (b). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:35 pm
Jobs said that this helped the company maintain its “A” players because they did not have to be around B or C players. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:35 pm
Jobs said that this helped the company maintain its “A” players because they did not have to be around B or C players. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
(c) The Award must have been caused by the fraud. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:37 pm
(c) The Award must have been caused by the fraud. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:17 am
§ 355(j)(5)(C)(ii)(I)). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:58 am
OUP’s acknowledgment of misconduct and the thoroughness of its investigation is evidence of how companies can address issues of fraud and corruption and change their corporate practices to foster integrity in the development business. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:22 am
Federal Circuit Court Finds Part C Medicare Advantage Plans Have Same Rights as CMS When Seeking Recovery from Primary Payer On June 28, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit published its decision on Humana Medical Plan and Humana Insurance Company v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:13 am
., B-403946.2 (June 29, 2012), the Defense Logistics Agency set-aside a procurement for HUBZone contractors, but awarded the contract to Federal Prison Industries rather than a HUBZone company. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
In its Judgment in Case C-378/10 VALE Építési Kft. the Court of Justice of the European Union notes that, in the absence of a uniform definition of companies in EU law, companies exist only by virtue of the national legislation which determines their incorporation and functioning. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
Comparison of the marks/signs concernedThis involves an analysis of whether the marks concerned are similar a. visually, b. phonetically or c. conceptually bearing in mind the marks viewed as a whole and having regard to the distinctive and dominant components. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 10:50 am
This allows for positive client relationships and a high reputation in that area for being a reliable company. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:06 am
The Legfelsobb Bíróság (Supreme Court, Hungary), which has to adjudicate on the application to register VALE Építési Kft., asks the Court of Justice whether Hungarian legislation which enables Hungarian companies to convert but prohibits companies established in another Member State from converting to Hungarian companies is compatible with the principle of the freedom of establishment. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 6:06 am
§ 2702(a)(2)(A)-(B). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:36 pm
By B. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 5:43 am
It is never a bad time to initiate a privacy audit, which will help you understand: (a) what you're saying; (b) what you're doing; (c) how those things differ; and (d) how you can improve. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
§ 77r(b)(1)(A) or (B), as amended; Traded in an organized market and has at least 2,000 stockholders and a market value of at least $20,000,000, exclusive of the value of such shares held by the corporation’s subsidiaries, senior executives, directors and beneficial stockholders owning more than 10 percent of such shares; or Issued by an open end management investment company registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment… [read post]
