Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 48,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 2:51 am
The post Case Comment:Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 59 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:22 am
The idea is that a RAS properly reflects the local cost of services. [read post]
27 May 2007, 4:34 pm
In McLean v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:14 am
Vedam v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:30 pm
For example, the Commissioner cites United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
See City of New York v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 5:41 am
The only costs are the lawyers and mediators. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm
The court awarded Chen his costs on the complaint and awarded Nicholas Labs its costs on the cross-complaint. [read post]
21 May 2010, 6:31 am
The case is Kaschke v Osler. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:57 am
On 26 June 2008 we reported that the Scottish Parliament had proposed a bill to reinstate compensation for individuals who have pleural plaques, thereby reversing in Scotland the effect of the House of Lord's decision in Johnston v NEI International Combustion. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
Subsequently, the State amended its complaint to seek the anticipated costs of the CERCLA recovery and assessment, as well as declaratory relief regarding the reasonable costs of assessing natural resource damages, a claim that is proceeding in district court. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
Of course we can't expect zero agency costs. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Quickly pays for all the costs of the gas and maintenance on the taxi. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:12 pm
In Berliner v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
He also noted that the costs for the parties came to over £300,000 (not limited to the committal application, it was true). [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 10:16 am
In Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:21 am
Warby J distinguished on the facts his recent decision in YXB v TNO [2015] EWHC 826 (QB) (see our post here), in which an interim order was discharged and not continued on the return date for material non-disclosure, and followed the high threshold established by the Supreme Court in Summers v Fairclough Homes Ltd [2012] UKSC 26 for the strike out of a statement of case for abuse of process. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:11 pm
Related Topics Nagpal v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm
In particular, the Court rejected the notion that the test in respect of restricting speech was a simple balancing test of the value of the speech against its societal costs. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:00 pm
DelaneyState v. [read post]
