Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 40,860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2020, 2:16 pm
Valera-Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
In the House, this even led to a near vote on a remote work proposal, before it was shut down due to partisan disagreement. [read post]
6 May 2020, 10:53 am
See, e.g., New York State Stop Hacks and Improve Electronic Data Security Act (SHIELD Act). [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:30 am
The speculators in Fletcher v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:47 pm
However, in two 2019 rulings – the Marchand v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 1:10 pm
The Supreme Court in Employment Division v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:54 am
The Case: Ridley v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:12 am
The idea of shutting down the economy, making everyone stay at home, wash their hands frequently and not touch their faces was to flatten the curve, slow the spread, so the hospitals could get on top of things. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:10 am
These recent decisions continue a long line of case law—including the maligned yet ubiquitous United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 9:55 am
Rather, both the federal government and the court of appeals advanced, quietly, Justice Thomas's position on severability from Murphy v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 8:04 am
—3/29/19 Another Round of Strange Bedfellows on Severability in Texas v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:20 am
On 30 April 2020, the Court of Appeal handed down a judgment confirming that the test for dishonesty in criminal law is that set out by the Supreme Court in Ivey v Genting Casinos, as opposed to the much criticised Ghosh test. [read post]
5 May 2020, 4:00 am
In Mohamed v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:32 am
In this post, Alaina Wadsworth and Sophie Newman, who both work within the insurance and reinsurance group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court last month in the matter of Aspen Underwriting Ltd and others v Credit Europe Bank NV [2020] UKSC 11. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:10 pm
Altman v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:10 pm
Altman v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:35 am
State v. [read post]
