Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 9,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2019, 11:47 am
Krishna Murthi v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:56 am
That is so because, unlike the English language’s alphabetic system, the Chinese language is character-based. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
The Course is completely in English. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:58 am
So, when it comes to reputed trade marks the extended protection is actionable whenever the relevant public "makes a connection between those marks" or "establishes a link between them" [see CJEU case law in Ferrero v OHMI, C‑552/09 P, Adidas-Salomon and Adidas Benelux, C‑408/01, and Intel Corporation, C-252/07]. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 12:08 pm
Collins v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Now, for the reader to get an idea of the second case, it should be sufficient to say that the word sign at issue was “TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION” (Board of Appeal's decision here) and that the Court consulted the Oxford Dictionary of English, instead of the Grand Larousse en 5 volumes… The IPKat appreciates the General Court's meditations on these two cases. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
-boycotted Caribbean island nation into the select group of the United States, Germany and Russia that produce vaccines with efficacy of more than 90% - Novavax, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and Sputnik V. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
As the English Court of Appeal noted in its 2008 judgment in Research in Motion UK Ltd v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
PETA has offices in the UK, so they can surely sue in an English cou [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 2:50 am
IndiaP v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:14 am
Lindon and others v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 5:40 am
In Colon v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Apple v Samsung v Apple v Samsung v Apple....Last year the AmeriKat was constantly up-to-date reporting on the latest of the patent mobile phone wars. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
Heller and in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
Unlike the anti-suit injunctions we are seeing now, the English courts have not issued any anti-suit injunctions to prevent infringement actions going forwards elsewhere. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am
V. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 pm
In Bryan v UK the European Court stated: 37. [read post]
