Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 8141 - 8160
of 15,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2014, 7:25 am
This figure includes £4,000 general damages and £12,850 VAT, which will be due on the remedial costs. v) The defendant’s various counterclaims for damages are dismissed. vi) The defendant is not entitled to move the gas meter and gas pipe to their proposed new positions. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am
The link to the transcript for the March 31, 2014 oral arguments before the SCOTUS in Alice Corp. v CLC Int’l can be found here. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Bauman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:50 pm
Figure 1E [(a block diagram)] [...], for example, does no more than restate other means-plus-function elements [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
The new Common Practice explains that:“A change only in colour does not alter the distinctive character of the trade mark, as long as the following requirements are met: a) the word/figurative elements coincide and are the main distinctive elements; b) the contrast of shades is respected; c) colour or combination of colours does not possess distinctive character in itself and; d) colour is not one of the main contributors to the overall distinctiveness of the mark. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:31 am
She focuses “less [on] the real-world impact than [on] what the decision tells us about the Supreme Court and Chief Justice Roberts, who at this rate and at age 59 figures to be with us a good deal longer than campaign finance laws. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Verizon v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
That case, Cutter v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:36 pm
The decision in Yates v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:16 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:08 am
., v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am
Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 1:58 pm
Technology Innovations, LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 11:57 am
OraLabs, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:09 am
The case is National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
The case was Vanden Bosch v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:24 am
Which is how this case reached the Court of Appeals.The case is Pierre v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:27 pm
Given these figures, what can be done to prevent what is often termed “unforeseeable? [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:10 am
Hunter Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm
This Leo knows why they may well be right in doing so: because the great majority of Nigerians do not care about this new-found status and the World Bank, for example, is yet to update its website with this new GDP figure. [read post]
